News from PANUG/BizNix - September 17, 2002 http://panug.org - http://biznix.org PANUG MEETING The PANUG user group's monthly meeting is this Thursday, September 19 at 6:15 pm. The presentation will cover Novell's iFolders. iFolders is a WebDAV-like application that allows mobile users to store data on a centralized file server. Unlike remote file systems like CIFS, iFolders is more secure and can be deployed without having to reconfigure your company firewall or deploy a VPN. Visit the PANUG Web site for meeting location. http://panug.org EXCUSES FOR SECURITY PROBLEMS by Ed Sawicki - Accelerated Learning Center / Tailored Computers A publishing industry-focused mailing list I'm on has been discussing the latest Word security hole that's described at Microsoft's Web site. The URL is very long. You can get there with this redirect: http://panug.org/wordsec The publishing industry is firmly entrenched in Microsoft Word. Security issues like this create lots of concern and discussion. Word and Windows security has been criticized numerous times on the list. Each time, list participants respond in the same way with the same excuses why they must ignore these problems and continue to use Word in spite of the problems. Here's a sample of the reasons/excuses: "There is nowhere safe [to store data]." "There are so many ways to do it [steal data] that an obscure oversight in some Word code is likely to be more hassle to take advantage of than it's worth." "Every security system will fail." "If someone really wants your data, they will have it." "You can only build so strong a door before it becomes easier to come through the wall [or the Windows]." "Ben Franklin summed up security the best, "The only way two people can keep a secret is if one of them is dead."" "The only thing safe is a never been formatted hard-drive that has no power attached to it." "Security, like pregnancy, is binary. Either you and your data are secure, or you and it are not." These people (there are a lot of them) take a binary view of security. The concept of "better security" doesn't seem to exist for them. Since they don't believe any system can be totally secure, they accept systems that have very little security. All of this means that the Internet and local networks are target-rich environments for attackers because the victims accept the attacks. Security involves shades of gray. You can be "more secure".