News from PANUG/BizNix - August 21, 2002 http://panug.org - http://biznix.org GOVERNMENT NIXES WIRELESS by Ed Sawicki - Accelerated Learning Center / Tailored Computers At last week's PANUG meeting, I did a presentation on Wireless Ethernet and Denial of Service attacks. If you missed the meeting, you can get a good idea of what was covered by reading an article at my company web site. Go to http://alcpress.com, click the Articles link, then click the Wireless Networks & DoS article. In a timely coincidence, both the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the US Department of Defense have issued policies and recommendations against the use of wireless in government facilities. The government's primary concern with wireless technologies are the security issues, while my article focuses on Denial of Service (network reliability). When you combine both of these issues, wireless networks seem to be too little benefit for far too great a risk. The NIST report is here: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/draft-sp800-48.pdf THE FONT POLICE? by Ed Sawicki - Accelerated Learning Center / Tailored Computers Several months ago at a BizNix meeting, I did a presentation on fonts. Part of the presentation focused on using the free Microsoft "TrueType core fonts for the Web" with Linux. At the time, I was careful to say "free - for now" because I knew that Microsoft would realize that many people who downloaded the fonts were not Windows users. Most of the fonts in the package already come with Windows. As predicted, Microsoft has pulled the font package from their Web site: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/default.htm When asked why they did this, the answer was: "Most users who wanted the fonts have downloaded them already. They ship with recent operating systems - Windows and Mac OS (via IE). In addition, the downloads were being abused - repackaged, modified and shipped with commercial products in violation of the end-user license agreement." Since most of the fonts in the package are already included with Windows, the above explanation seems silly. The more likely reason is to prevent the fonts from being used with Microsoft's chief competition - Linux. If Microsoft demands that we stop using their fonts on non-Windows computers, will we be able to comply? Like most people, I have a mix of fonts installed on my computers. Some were supplied by Microsoft, some downloaded from the net, many were supplied with other software, and some I've purchased. I don't think I can remember which are which. I use many of these fonts with Linux. What will we do if Microsoft and the BSA stage "font raids" into companies looking for illegal fonts? How will we prove we're not violating a Microsoft license? Will the BSA offer a 31-day Font Truce at a special price?